SINGAPORE – The number of students caught plagiarising and passing off content generated by artificial intelligence as their own work remains low, the public universities here said following a recent case at NTU. But professors are watching closely for signs of misuse, warning that over-reliance on AI could undermine learning. Some are calling for more creative forms of assessment. Their comments follow NTU’s decision to award these students zero marks for an assignment after discovering they had used generative AI tools in their work. The move drew attention after one of the students posted about it on online forum Reddit, sparking debate about the growing role of AI in education and its impact on academic integrity. All six universities here generally allow students to use gen AI to varying degrees, depending on the module or coursework. To uphold academic integrity, students are required to declare when and how they use such tools. In the past three years, Singapore Management University (SMU) recorded “less than a handful” of cases of AI-related academic misconduct, it said, without giving specific numbers. Similarly, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) encountered a “handful of academic integrity cases, primarily involving plagiarism”, during the same time period. At Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS), confirmed cases of academic dishonesty involving gen AI remain low, but the university has seen a “slight uptick” in such reports, partly due to heightened faculty vigilance and use of detection tools. The other universities – NUS, Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and NTU – did not respond to queries about whether more students have been caught for flouting the rules using AI. Recognising that AI technologies are here to stay, universities said they are exploring better ways to integrate such tools meaningfully and critically into learning. Gen AI refers to technologies that can produce human-like text, images or other content based on prompts. Educational institutions worldwide have been grappling with balancing its challenges and opportunities, while maintaining academic integrity. Faculty members here have flexibility to decide how AI can be used in their courses, as long as their decisions align with university-wide policies. NUS allows AI use for take-home assignments if properly attributed, although instructors have to design complex tasks to prevent over-reliance. For modules focused on core skills, assessments may be done in person or designed to go beyond AI’s capabilities. At SMU, instructors inform students which AI tools are allowed, and guide them on their use, typically for idea generation or research-heavy projects outside exams. SIT has reviewed assessments and trained staff to manage AI use, encouraging it in advanced courses like coding but restricting it in foundational ones, while SUTD has integrated gen AI into its design thinking curriculum to foster higher-order thinking. The idea is to teach students when AI should be a tool, partner or avoided. Universities said that students must ensure originality and credibility in their work. The allure of gen AI Students interviewed by The Straits Times, who requested to remain anonymous, said AI usage is […]
2星期前
BEIJING – The Dalai Lama said only his organisation can recognise his reincarnation, a statement that Beijing has swiftly rejected amid a renewed tussle over who has the right to appoint the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, as it insists that any successor must be approved by the Chinese government. In a recorded video statement on July 2, the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, whom Beijing regards as a separatist, reiterated that only the Gaden Phodrang Trust he founded “has the sole authority to recognise the future reincarnation”. “No one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter,” said the Dalai Lama, whose statement comes four days ahead of his 90th birthday on July 7, in a clear rebuke to China, which annexed Tibet in 1951. He also affirmed that he will have a successor upon his death, ending years of speculation that began when he previously indicated that he might be the last person to hold the role. Many observers widely expect China to name its rival successor to the Dalai Lama post, as a Beijing-backed leader would help legitimise its rule in Tibet, which has long resisted full assimilation into Chinese culture. At the regular media briefing on July 2, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said the Dalai Lama’s succession must comply with religious rituals and historical conventions as well as Chinese laws and regulations. “The reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, the Panchen Lama and other grand living Buddhas must go through the golden urn lottery procedure and be subject to the approval of the central government,” she said. The lot-drawing system, where names are drawn from a golden urn, was introduced during the Qing Dynasty in 1793. The current 14th Dalai Lama was himself identified in “strict accordance with religious rituals and historical conventions” after the passing of the 13th Dalai Lama, and was informed after being granted exemption from the lottery by the then central government, said Ms Mao. Critics, however, say that the reincarnation process is guided by spiritual signs and not a state-administered lottery. Some argue that the lottery system is being wielded as a political tool to assert Beijing’s control over Tibetan Buddhism and is part of its broader Sinicisation campaign to assimilate all religions into Chinese culture. The present Panchen Lama – the second-highest-ranking leader in Tibetan Buddhism – was appointed by Beijing after the previous figure died in 1989. Earlier in June, he met Chinese President Xi Jinping, pledging support to the leadership of the Communist Party of China and saying he would work to align Tibetan Buddhism more closely with Chinese values. The Dalai Lama had identified a successor to the Panchen Lama post when the previous figure died, but the successor, a child, was allegedly taken away by the Chinese authorities. At the media briefing, Ms Mao said China’s policy of Sinicisation of religions is not to restrict religion from growing and prospering. “It has to adapt itself to the traditional and development stage of the country. Tibetan Buddhism was born in China and itself is an example of religion adapting to […]
2星期前
更多The Straits Times
